Volume 1, Issue 1 (1-2026)                   Economy and Food Security 2026, 1(1): 118-128 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mirdeilami S S, Joolaie R, Soltani A, Rezaee A. (2026). Measuring the Technical, Allocative, and Economic Efficiency of Irrigated Wheat-Producing Provinces by a Non-Parametric Method. Economy and Food Security. 1(1), 118-128. doi:10.61882/efs.2025.68
URL: http://efs.sanru.ac.ir/article-1-68-en.html
1- Department of Agricultural Economics, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
2- Department of Agronomy, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
Abstract:   (1229 Views)
Extended Abstract
Background: Efficiency is a crucial factor in enhancing the productivity of production factors, particularly for developing countries. These countries face challenges of limited resources and opportunities for development and the adoption of better technology. Generally, considering the recognition of capabilities and limitations in the agricultural sector of Iran's economy, it can be argued that the most suitable solution for increasing production and income of farmers is the proper utilization of existing production factors, improving technical efficiency, or achieving maximum output from a fixed set of production factors. Therefore, the most essential prerequisite for achieving economic growth and prosperity in the agricultural sector is the assessment of the efficiency of agricultural units. This study aims to measure the technical, allocative, and economic efficiencies of wheat producers in selected provinces of the country.
Methods: Various methods are available for evaluating performance and measuring the efficiency of decision-making units, which are generally classified into two groups: parametric approaches, such as Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA), and non-parametric approaches, such as Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). In this study, the economic, allocative, and technical efficiencies of irrigated wheat-producing provinces are estimated using the DEA method. The required data for this research, including the consumption level and prices of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, seeds, labor, machinery, cultivated area, and wheat production, were obtained from the Ministry of Agriculture Jihad's agricultural cost bank and the agricultural information bank for the year 2019. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) with an input-oriented approach was used to measure efficiency. DEA is a linear programming method used to measure the relative efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and outputs. This method is widely used to evaluate efficiency in various economic sectors, including agriculture. In this study, each province is considered a DMU. The inputs of the model include the cultivated area (hectares), the amount of chemical fertilizers (kg), the amount of poison (liters), the amount of seeds (kg), the hours of using machinery (hours), the number of workers (man-day), and the output of the model are the amount of irrigated wheat production (kg). The DEA model was implemented with the assumption of constant return to scale (CRS) and variable return to scale (VRS). The CRS model assumes that an increase in inputs leads to a proportional increase in outputs, while the VRS model does not and allows returns to scale to vary.
Results: Among 30 provinces of the country, the lowest technical efficiency (72.5%) was in Khorasan Razavi Province, while the highest technical efficiency (100%) was recorded in provinces such as Khuzestan, Golestan, Kermanshah, East Azerbaijan, Hamadan, Ilam, Tehran, Kurdistan, Mazandaran, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad, South Khorasan, Hormozgan, Bushehr, Alborz, Yazd, and Qom. Moreover, the average technical efficiency of wheat-producing provinces was 94.3% in variable VRS conditions. Among 30 provinces, the lowest allocative efficiency was 54.5% in Sistan and Baluchestan Province, while the highest allocative efficiency (100%) was observed in provinces such as Khuzestan, Golestan, Tehran, and Qom. The average allocative efficiency of wheat-producing provinces was 81.8% in VRS conditions. The lowest economic efficiency (47.7%) was in Sistan and Baluchestan Province, while the highest economic efficiency (100%) was found in provinces such as Khuzestan, Golestan, Tehran, and Qom. The average economic efficiency of wheat-producing provinces was 77.3% in variable returns to scale (VRS) conditions. The highest levels of inefficiency were associated with the use of machinery and labor inputs, amounting to 23.22% and 14%, respectively. In contrast, the lowest inefficiencies belonged to land, seed, chemical fertilizer, and pesticide inputs, with values of 0.59%, 1.59%, 2.63%, and 2.88%, respectively.
Conclusion: Among 30 wheat-producing provinces, Khuzestan, Golestan, Tehran, and Qom simultaneously had the highest technical, allocative, and economic efficiencies (100%), while Khorasan Razavi Province had the lowest technical efficiency (72.5%), and Sistan and Baluchestan Province had the lowest allocative and economic efficiencies (54.5% and 47.7%, respectively). Considering the difference between the best and worst producers, it is recommended to provide a platform for successful provinces to share their experiences and methods with others. The results suggest that extension and agricultural service centers should organize educational and promotional classes to optimize the use of inputs, especially chemical fertilizers and pesticides. Land consolidation programs should be seriously pursued in each region to not only save on inputs, such as labor and machinery, but also reduce costs and utilize modern technology over large land areas. It is suggested to support applied research in the field of improving the management of input consumption in the production of irrigated wheat according to the climatic and socioeconomic conditions of each region. This can be done by allocating research funds and motivating researchers.

 
Full-Text [PDF 1533 kb]   (30 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2025/07/26 | Accepted: 2025/12/5

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Economy and Food Security

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb