1. Aitken, N. D. (1973). The effect of the EEC and EFTA on European trade: A temporal cross-section analysis. The American Economic Review, 63(5), 881-892.
2. Alamri, Y. A., Alnafissa, M. A., Kotb, A., Alagsam, F., Aldakhil, A. I., Alfadil, I. E., ... & Alaagib, S. (2024). Estimating the Expected Commercial Potential of Saudi Date Exports to Middle Eastern Countries Using the Gravity Model. Sustainability, 16(6), 2552. [
DOI:10.3390/su16062552]
3. Anderson, J. E. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. The American Economic Review, 69(1), 106-116.
4. Anderson, J. E., & Van Wincoop, E. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. The American Economic Review, 93(1), 170-192. [
DOI:10.1257/000282803321455214]
5. Antonucci, D., & Manzocchi, S. (2006). Does Turkey have a special trade relation with the EU? A gravity model approach. Economic Systems, 30(2), 157-169. [
DOI:10.1016/j.ecosys.2005.10.003]
6. Arghavani Pirsalami, F., Alipour, H., & Amini, H. (2023). Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO( and Iran Economic Diplomacy in Central Asia. Majlis and Rahbord, 30(113), 383-422. doi: 10.22034/mr.2022.4919.4750. [In Persian]
7. Azizi, S. (2024) China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): The Role of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) in Geopolitical Security and Economic Cooperation. Open Journal of Political Science, 14, 111-129. [
DOI:10.4236/ojps.2024.141007]
8. Baier, S. L., & Bergstrand, J. H. (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade? Journal of International Economics, 71(1), 72-95. [
DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.02.005]
9. Baier, S. L., Bergstrand, J. H., & Feng, M. (2014). Economic integration agreements and the margins of international trade. Journal of International Economics, 93(2), 339-350. [
DOI:10.1016/j.jinteco.2014.03.005]
10. Bergstrand, J. H. (1985). The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 474-481. [
DOI:10.2307/1925976]
11. Brun, J. F., Carre're, C., Guillaumont, P., & De Melo, J. (2005). Has Distance Died? Evidence from a panel Gravity Model. The world Bank Economic Review, 19(1), 99-120. [
DOI:10.1093/wber/lhi004]
12. Çekyay, B., Palut, P. T., Kabak, Ö., Ülengin, F., Özaydın, Ö., & Ülengin, B. (2017). Analysis of the impact of bilateral and transit quotas on Turkey's international trade by road transport: An integrated maximum flow and gravity model approach. Research in Transportation Economics, 66, 70-77. [
DOI:10.1016/j.retrec.2017.04.006]
13. Deardorff, A. (1998). Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Classical World? In: The Regionalization of the World Economy, ed. Jeffrey Frankel. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Filip, D. (2017). Jacob Viner and Gottfried von Haberler, two theories of Custom :union:, a precise answer for the European :union:.
15. Gashi, P., Hisarciklilar, M., & Pugh, G. (2017). Kosovo-EU trade relations: a dynamic panel poisson approach. Applied Economics, 49(27), 2642-2654. [
DOI:10.1080/00036846.2016.1245836]
16. Gruber, W. H., & Vernon, R. (1970). The technology factor in a world trade matrix. In The Technology Factor in Iinternational Trade, (pp. 233-301). NBER.
17. Karimi Hosnijeh, H (2007). Globalization, economic integration and trade potential: investigation of gravity model in Iran's trade analysis. New Economy and Trade, 5, 118-143. [In Persian]
18. Khetran, M. S. (2019). SCO membership and Pakistan. Strategic Studies, 39(2), 83-95. [
DOI:10.53532/ss.039.02.00113]
19. Leamer, E. E., & Levinsohn, J. (1995). International trade theory: the evidence. Handbook of International Economics, 3, 1339-1394. [
DOI:10.1016/S1573-4404(05)80006-1]
20. Lin, Z., Sun, D., Li, B., & Wang, K. (2016). Research on the structural evolution of Shanghai Cooperation Organization network. 6th International Conference on Information Communication and Management (ICICM). [
DOI:10.1109/INFOCOMAN.2016.7784221]
21. Linder, S. B. (1961). An essay on trade and transformation (Doctoral dissertation, Stockholm School of Economics).
22. Linnemann, H. (1966). An econometric study of international trade flows (No. 42). North-Holland Published Company.
23. McCallum, J. (1995). National borders matter: Canada-US regional trade patterns. The American Economic Review, 85(3), 615-623.
24. Moradi Haghighi, F. (2022). The possibility of economic convergence between the members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and the opportunities facing Iran. International Relations Studies Quarterly, 16(2), 195-234. [In Persian]
25. Newbery, D. M., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1984). Pareto inferior trade. The Review of Economic Studies, 51(1), 1-12. [
DOI:10.2307/2297701]
26. Razini, E. A., Shahani, F., & Vodjani Tehrani, H. (2014) Investigating the trade potential between Iran and the member countries of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) using the gravity model. Business Research Quarterly, 69, 112-83. [In Persian]
27. Sadeghi, P., Hosseini, S. S., & Moghaddasi, R. (2019). Analyzing Iran's Export Market Potential, Gravity Model: Evidence from Date Market. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 21(4), 773-783.
28. Taghipour Kandasar, M., Bayazid Nejad, D., & Valizadeh, E. (2024). Investigating the Factors Affecting the Trade of Agricultural Products Between Iran and Russia using the Gravity Model. Journal of Economics and Food Security, 1(1), 73-85. doi:10.61186/ame.1.1.73. [In Persian] [
DOI:10.61186/ame.1.1.73]
29. Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the world economy; suggestions for an international economic policy. Books (Jan Tinbergen).
30. Toossi, M., Moghadasi, R., Yazdani, S., & Ahmadian, M. (2011). Regionalism and Iran's Agricultural Trade Promotion in Economic Cooperation Organization (ECO). Agricultural Economics, 4(4), 131-157.
31. Ülengin, F., Çekyay, B., Palut, P. T., Ülengin, B., Kabak, Ö., Özaydın, Ö., & Ekici, Ş. Ö. (2015). Effects of quotas on Turkish foreign trade: A gravity model. Transport Policy, 38, 1-7. [
DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.09.006]
32. Yang, S., & Martinez-Zarzoso, I. (2014). A panel data analysis of trade creation and trade diversion effects: The case of ASEAN-China Free Trade Area. China Economic Review, 29, 138-151. [
DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2014.04.002]